AI Scribe for Telehealth: Complete Guide to Virtual Visit Documentation (2025)

Telehealth has become a permanent fixture in healthcare delivery, with virtual visits now accounting for 15-25% of all outpatient care encounters (HIMSS 2024). But the documentation burden that plagues in-person visits is equally challenging—if not more so—in the virtual environment, where screen real estate is divided between video windows and EHR systems. AI medical scribes offer a powerful solution, enabling providers to deliver focused, high-quality virtual care while documentation happens automatically in the background.

---

What Is a Telehealth AI Scribe?

Comprehensive Definition

A telehealth AI scribe is an advanced artificial intelligence system specifically designed to automatically document virtual patient encounters by capturing audio from video consultations, transcribing physician-patient conversations with medical-grade accuracy, distinguishing between speakers, extracting clinically relevant information, and generating structured clinical notes that integrate directly into electronic health record systems—all while allowing providers to maintain complete focus on patients during video calls without the cognitive burden of simultaneous documentation.

Why Telehealth Documentation Differs from In-Person

Virtual care presents unique documentation challenges that make AI scribes particularly valuable for telehealth settings. According to JAMIA 2024 research analyzing 10,000+ telehealth encounters, telehealth documentation takes 12-18% longer than in-person visits when performed manually, driven by several factors: the inability to type while maintaining video eye contact (patients notice screen distraction more acutely on video), limited screen real estate with video windows competing with EHR, technical multitasking managing video controls plus documentation, rapid succession of back-to-back virtual visits with zero travel time between encounters, and the heightened perception of disengagement when physicians type during video calls versus in-person visits.

Five Key Dimensions of Telehealth AI Scribes

Telehealth AI scribes operate across five critical dimensions that distinguish them from general transcription or in-person AI scribes:

1. Multi-Platform Audio Capture (95-99% fidelity – Black Book 2024)
Telehealth AI scribes must capture audio from diverse platforms (Zoom, Teams, Doxy.me) and network conditions. Leading systems achieve 95-99% audio capture fidelity even with variable internet quality, using adaptive bitrate processing, jitter buffer management, and packet loss concealment. This dimension is critical because telehealth audio quality varies dramatically—patient home internet can range from fiber gigabit to cellular hotspot, creating 20-40 dB signal-to-noise ratio variation. Black Book 2024 analysis of 50,000+ telehealth encounters shows audio capture quality is the #1 predictor of downstream transcription accuracy.

2. Speaker Diarization Accuracy (90-95% for 2-3 speakers – JAMIA 2024)
Distinguishing who said what during telehealth encounters is more challenging than in-person because visual cues are limited. Advanced AI scribes use voice biometric analysis, prosody patterns, contextual attribution (questions typically physician, answers typically patient), and role-based prediction to achieve 90-95% speaker diarization accuracy for standard 2-3 participant calls (physician-patient or physician-patient-family). Accuracy drops to 85-92% with 4+ participants or when using phone-only audio. This matters because incorrect attribution—e.g., attributing patient symptoms to physician or vice versa—creates clinical documentation errors.

3. Virtual Environment Noise Filtering (improves accuracy 8-15% – JAMIA 2024)
Home environments generate unique background noise: children, pets, doorbells, sirens, television, appliances, roommates. Telehealth AI scribes must filter these sounds while preserving clinically relevant speech. Advanced systems use deep learning noise suppression trained on 100,000+ hours of home environment audio, achieving 8-15% accuracy improvement over systems without specialized telehealth noise filtering. JAMIA 2024 testing shows background television reduces generic speech recognition accuracy by 12-18%, but telehealth-optimized AI maintains accuracy within 2-4% of quiet conditions.

4. Real-Time Processing and Latency (1-3 minute note availability – MGMA 2024)
For telehealth workflows with back-to-back visits, note availability speed is critical. Leading telehealth AI scribes complete note generation within 1-3 minutes after visit conclusion (MGMA 2024), compared to 5-15 minutes for some in-person systems. This requires streaming audio processing, progressive transcription, incremental clinical extraction, and optimized note assembly pipelines. Fast processing enables same-day chart closure rates of 94-97% for telehealth vs. 78-85% for manually documented telehealth visits.

5. Platform-Agnostic Integration (works with 15+ platforms – Black Book 2024)
Unlike in-person AI scribes that operate in controlled clinical environments, telehealth AI scribes must integrate with diverse video platforms, operating systems (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android), browsers (Chrome, Edge, Safari), and EHR systems. Top solutions support 15+ telehealth platforms through system audio capture, browser extensions, native platform integrations, mobile apps, and virtual audio devices. Black Book 2024 analysis shows platform compatibility is the #2 factor (after accuracy) in telehealth AI scribe selection decisions.

Telehealth AI Scribe vs. Traditional Dictation

Understanding the fundamental difference between telehealth AI scribes and traditional dictation is essential for evaluating solutions:

Dimension	Traditional Dictation	Telehealth AI Scribe	Impact
Timing	After visit ends	During visit	AI eliminates post-visit documentation time
Speaking Style	Dictation mode with commands	Natural conversation	No special speaking style needed
Patient Interaction	Separate from documentation	Simultaneous	Maintains patient connection throughout
Learning Curve	Moderate (2-4 weeks)	Low (3-5 days)	Faster adoption, less training needed
Time Savings	30-50% vs. typing	69-81% vs. typing	Significantly greater efficiency gain
Output Format	Transcript of dictation	Structured clinical note	AI handles formatting and organization
Eye Contact	Still requires off-camera time	Full eye contact maintained	Critical for telehealth patient experience

For detailed comparison of AI scribes versus traditional approaches, see our guide on AI vs. Human Medical Scribe.

Telehealth Adoption Impact Chain

Implementing AI scribes for telehealth creates a positive feedback loop of outcomes. KLAS 2024 longitudinal study tracking 2,500+ telehealth providers over 12 months demonstrates this cause-effect chain:

94-98% telehealth AI scribe accuracy (KLAS 2024) → 1-3 minute post-visit review time (MGMA 2024) → 69-81% documentation time reduction vs. manual telehealth documentation → 2.4 additional virtual visits possible per day (capacity expansion) → 87% after-hours charting elimination (Stanford 2024 telehealth cohort) → 94-97% same-day chart closure vs. 78-85% without AI → 43% improvement in patient-reported provider attentiveness scores (telehealth-specific metric) → 30% burnout score improvement at 6 months focused on telehealth providers (Stanford 2024) → 68% increase in provider willingness to conduct telehealth (reverses common telehealth resistance) → Organization can expand virtual care capacity without proportional documentation staff increase → 4,800-6,500% ROI over 3 years for telehealth-focused practices (Black Book 2024).

Conversely, inadequate telehealth documentation solutions drive negative outcomes: Manual telehealth documentation → 12-18% longer than in-person documentation (JAMIA 2024) → Divided attention between screen and patient → 43% lower patient satisfaction vs. in-person (telehealth-specific decline) → 47% higher after-hours documentation burden → 58% of physicians report telehealth as “more exhausting” than in-person → Providers resist telehealth scheduling → Organizations struggle to scale virtual care programs.

---

How Telehealth AI Scribes Work: Technical Architecture

Understanding the technical architecture of telehealth AI scribes helps evaluate solutions and optimize implementation. Modern telehealth AI scribes employ sophisticated seven-stage processing pipelines specifically designed for virtual care challenges.

Stage 1: Multi-Platform Audio Capture

Telehealth AI scribes must capture audio from diverse platforms using multiple technical approaches:

System Audio Capture Method:
Most versatile approach—captures all computer audio using operating system-level APIs (Windows: WASAPI, Mac: CoreAudio). Works with any telehealth platform but requires proper audio routing configuration. Achieves 96-99% audio capture completeness when properly configured (Black Book 2024).

Native Platform Integration:
Direct integration with telehealth platform APIs (Zoom SDK, Teams Graph API, WebRTC access). Provides highest audio quality and reliability (98-99% capture rate) but platform-specific—requires separate integration for each platform. Black Book 2024 reports native integrations reduce audio quality issues by 68% vs. system capture.

Browser Extension Capture:
Chrome/Edge extensions intercept WebRTC audio streams from browser-based telehealth. Deployment advantage: no client installation, works across platforms using same browser tech. Achieves 95-98% capture rate for browser-based telehealth (JAMIA 2024).

Mobile App Companion:
Separate mobile app on smartphone captures audio via speakerphone or wired connection. Platform-agnostic but requires additional device setup. Used primarily when conducting telehealth from mobile devices.

Virtual Audio Device:
Software creates virtual microphone/speaker that routes audio through AI scribe. Provides high-quality capture (97-99%) but requires more technical setup. Preferred for power users and IT-managed deployments.

Stage 2: Network Quality Optimization & Packet Loss Handling

Telehealth audio traverses variable network conditions requiring sophisticated handling. JAMIA 2024 analysis of 25,000+ telehealth encounters found:

Packet Loss Concealment: When network drops packets (occurs in 8-15% of telehealth calls), advanced AI scribes use packet loss concealment algorithms that predict missing audio samples based on surrounding context, reducing transcription errors from 12-18% to 3-6% during packet loss events.

Jitter Buffer Management: Audio packets arrive at inconsistent intervals over internet. AI scribes implement adaptive jitter buffers that balance latency vs. completeness, optimizing for transcription accuracy rather than real-time playback. Reduces jitter-induced transcription errors by 45-60%.

Adaptive Bitrate Processing: Automatically adjusts processing based on detected audio quality—applies more aggressive noise filtering when signal-to-noise ratio drops, switches to more robust transcription models for poor audio.

Connection Drop Recovery: When telehealth connection drops briefly (happens in 12-18% of calls), AI scribes detect gaps, flag them for physician review, and seamlessly resume capture when reconnected. Leading systems achieve 96-98% audio recovery after reconnection within 10 seconds.

Stage 3: Speaker Diarization for Telehealth

Distinguishing speakers during telehealth is more challenging than in-person due to limited visual cues. Advanced systems employ multi-modal speaker diarization:

Voice Biometric Analysis: AI analyzes fundamental frequency (pitch), formant patterns, speaking rate, prosody, voice quality. Creates speaker profiles achieving 92-96% accuracy distinguishing two speakers (physician-patient) in typical telehealth conditions (JAMIA 2024).

Stereo Channel Separation: Some platforms (Zoom, Teams) provide separate audio channels for each participant. When available, this provides 98-99% speaker attribution accuracy—dramatically easier than analyzing mixed audio.

Contextual Attribution: AI uses medical knowledge to attribute statements logically. Questions about symptoms typically physician, answers typically patient. “How long have you had this pain?” → physician. “About three weeks” → patient. Improves accuracy 5-8% beyond voice analysis alone.

Role-Based Prediction: Machine learning models trained on 100,000+ physician-patient conversations learn conversational patterns. Physicians ask more questions, use medical terminology, discuss plans. Patients describe experiences, ask about side effects. Achieves 85-92% accuracy on voice-agnostic attribution.

Multi-Speaker Scenarios: For calls with 3+ participants (patient + family member, or multiple providers), accuracy drops to 85-92%. Some systems ask users to briefly identify each speaker at call start for optimal results.

Stage 4: Medical-Grade Speech Recognition

Telehealth introduces unique speech recognition challenges beyond in-person encounters:

Acoustic Challenges: Compressed audio (typical telehealth uses 32-48 kbps vs. 128+ kbps for high-quality audio), codec artifacts (Opus, AAC compression introduces distortions), background noise from home environments, suboptimal patient microphones (laptop/phone mics vs. professional medical office equipment).

Medical Vocabulary Processing: Recognition engines must handle 300,000+ medical terms, medication names with sound-alikes (Celebrex/Celexa), anatomical terminology, procedure names, rare condition names. Leading telehealth AI scribes achieve 97-99% medical term accuracy for common vocabulary, 92-96% for rare specialized terms (Black Book 2024).

Accent & Dialect Handling: Telehealth expands geographic reach—patients and physicians from diverse regions. Modern systems handle 50+ English language variants (US regional, UK, Australian, South African, Indian English, etc.) with 94-98% accuracy. Non-native English speakers present ongoing challenge, with accuracy 5-12% lower than native speakers initially, improving 3-6% over time with user-specific adaptation (JAMIA 2024).

Stage 5: Clinical NLP & Medical Entity Recognition

Raw transcripts must be analyzed for clinical meaning—this stage distinguishes AI scribes from basic transcription:

Named Entity Recognition: Extracts and categorizes clinical entities including symptoms (chest pain, shortness of breath, headache), diagnoses (acute bronchitis, diabetes mellitus type 2), medications (metformin 500mg, lisinopril 10mg), procedures (colonoscopy, chest X-ray), anatomical structures (right knee, left anterior chest), vital signs (blood pressure 120/80, heart rate 72). Leading systems achieve 94-98% entity recognition accuracy (Black Book 2024).

Negation Detection: Critical for patient safety—understanding “patient denies chest pain” means NO chest pain, not presence of chest pain. Advanced systems achieve 92-97% negation detection accuracy, but this remains a vulnerability point requiring physician review. For detailed analysis, see our guide on AI Medical Scribe Accuracy.

Temporal Extraction: Understanding time relationships—”started three weeks ago,” “worse in the mornings,” “intermittent for the past month.” Essential for HPI chronology. Achieves 88-94% accuracy extracting temporal information.

Relationship Extraction: Connecting related clinical concepts—linking symptoms to diagnoses, medications to conditions, procedures to findings. “Patient’s diabetes is well-controlled on metformin” connects condition + status + medication. Achieves 85-92% relationship extraction accuracy (JAMIA 2024).

Stage 6: Telehealth-Specific Contextual Understanding

AI must understand clinical context unique to virtual visits:

Visual Examination Adaptations: Recognizing when physicians describe visual findings during video examination: “I can see the rash on your arm appears to be improving,” “looking at the wound on your screen, it appears clean and healing well.” AI must infer examination occurred via video.

Technology Discussion Filtering: Telehealth conversations include technology troubleshooting (“Can you hear me?” “Your video is frozen”) that should not appear in clinical note. Advanced systems filter 95-98% of technology-related conversation (KLAS 2024).

Home Environment Context: Understanding references to home circumstances relevant to care: “I notice your home is quite cold—that may be affecting your symptoms,” “it’s good that your family is there to help with your medications.” Captures relevant home assessment details.

Asynchronous Information Handling: Patients often share photos or documents during telehealth. AI recognizes these events: “Thank you for sharing that photo of the rash,” and documents appropriately.

Stage 7: Structured Note Generation & EHR Integration

Final stage transforms clinical understanding into formatted documentation:

Template Selection: AI chooses appropriate note structure—SOAP note for follow-ups (see our SOAP Note Template guide), focused visit note for acute complaints, progress note for chronic disease management (see Progress Note Template), consultation note for specialty referrals.

Content Organization: Places information in correct sections—symptoms to HPI, physical findings to exam (even if examination was visual via video), assessment of diagnoses, plan including prescriptions and follow-up.

Medical Writing Style: Converts conversational language to professional medical prose. “The patient says their knee really hurts and it’s been bugging them for like two weeks” becomes “The patient reports right knee pain of two-week duration.”

EHR Integration: Delivers completed note through multiple integration methods—direct API integration (Epic, Cerner, athenahealth), FHIR connections, copy-paste workflows, discrete field population. For comprehensive integration details, see our AI Scribe EHR Integration Guide.

Quality Assurance Flags: Highlights low-confidence transcriptions, potential medication errors, incomplete information, sections requiring physician attention. Physicians review and sign final note.

Continuous Learning & Telehealth-Specific Optimization

Leading telehealth AI scribes continuously improve through:

Platform-Specific Tuning: Learning audio characteristics of each telehealth platform (Zoom audio compression patterns differ from Teams, which differ from Doxy.me). Black Book 2024 shows platform-specific tuning improves accuracy 3-6%.

Provider Adaptation: Learning individual physician speaking patterns, vocabulary preferences, documentation style. Achieves 2-5% accuracy improvement over first 30-90 days.

Specialty Customization: Adapting to specialty-specific telehealth needs—behavioral health conversations differ from primary care, which differ from dermatology. Specialty-specific training improves accuracy 4-7% (Black Book 2024).

Network Condition Adaptation: Learning to optimize for common network issues in practice’s geographic area—rural practices with limited broadband require different optimization than urban high-speed connections.

---

Why AI Scribes Are Essential for Telehealth

The Screen Competition Challenge

Video calls create a fundamental competition for screen space and attention. MGMA 2024 workflow analysis of 5,000+ telehealth visits documented this challenge:

Challenge	Without AI Scribe	With AI Scribe	Impact Metrics
Eye Contact	Frequently looking away to type—avg 43% of visit looking at screen vs. camera	Maintained throughout visit—87% of visit making eye contact	43% improvement in patient-reported attentiveness (MGMA 2024)
Documentation Time	10-15 minutes per visit post-encounter	1-3 minutes for AI note review	69-81% time reduction (MGMA 2024)
Patient Experience	Feels impersonal, distracted—patient satisfaction 12-18% lower than in-person	Feels connected, focused—patient satisfaction approaches in-person levels	15% patient satisfaction improvement for telehealth (KLAS 2024)
Visit Throughput	Limited by documentation—avg 2.8 visits/hour possible	Can see more patients—avg 3.6 visits/hour achievable	2.4 additional daily visits possible (8-hour schedule)
After-Hours Work	Significant catch-up required—34% of telehealth notes completed after hours	Notes done in real-time—only 4-8% after-hours completion	87% after-hours charting elimination (Stanford 2024)
Note Quality	May miss details while distracted—18-24% of key elements omitted when multitasking	Complete capture of conversation—93-97% key element capture	23% improvement in documentation completeness (MGMA 2024)
Chart Closure	Delayed—78-85% same-day closure rate	Immediate—94-97% same-day closure	12-16 percentage point improvement (Black Book 2024)

---

Key Features for Telehealth AI Scribes

Essential Capabilities

Advanced Features for Telehealth Excellence

Feature	Description	Benefit / Impact
Live Transcription Display	Real-time transcript visible during call on second screen or overlay	Verify capture quality, reference previous statements, catch misunderstandings—reduces post-visit edits 18-25% (KLAS 2024)
Audio Timestamp Linking	Click on any sentence in note to hear original audio clip	Easy verification and correction of transcription errors—saves 30-45 seconds per correction vs. manual editing
Automated Coding Suggestions	AI suggests appropriate CPT/ICD-10 billing codes based on documentation	Improved revenue capture—5-12% billing optimization (MGMA 2024), particularly valuable for telehealth complexity coding
Patient Summary Generation	Automatic creation of patient-friendly after-visit summary from clinical note	Enhanced patient communication—saves 3-5 minutes per visit creating summaries manually, improves compliance 8-14%
Follow-Up Action Extraction	AI identifies and surfaces required follow-ups (labs, imaging, referrals, appointments)	Nothing falls through cracks—reduces missed follow-ups 52-67% (Black Book 2024), critical safety improvement
Multi-Language Support	Handles non-English telehealth visits (Spanish, Mandarin, Hindi, etc.)	Serves diverse patient populations—15-28% of telehealth encounters involve non-English speakers in diverse markets
Interpreter Call Support	Handles 3-way calls with professional medical interpreters	Documents interpreted conversations—distinguishes physician, patient, and interpreter speech. Accuracy 82-88% for 3-party calls
Quality Score Dashboard	Real-time analytics on audio quality, transcription confidence, documentation completeness	Proactive quality monitoring—identify and fix issues before they impact accuracy

---

Telehealth Platform Integration

Major Platform Compatibility Matrix

Platform	Market Share	Integration Methods	AI Scribe Considerations
Zoom for Healthcare	38% (HIMSS 2024)	Native SDK integration, browser extension, system audio	Most widely supported—virtually all AI scribes support Zoom. Native integration provides 98-99% audio capture quality
Microsoft Teams	24% (HIMSS 2024)	Graph API integration, browser extension, system audio	Strong for enterprise environments with M365. Graph API enables deep EHR integration for combined workflows
Doxy.me	18% (HIMSS 2024)	Browser extension, system audio, WebRTC capture	Popular in small practices for simplicity. Browser extension most common integration. 95-97% capture rate typical
Epic MyChart Video	8% (HIMSS 2024)	System audio, EHR-integrated APIs	Direct-to-Epic workflow—notes flow seamlessly into encounter. Requires vendor Epic partnership for optimal integration
athenahealth Telehealth	5% (HIMSS 2024)	Browser extension, system audio, athena API	Integrated with athenaOne EHR—single workflow for telehealth + documentation. Check AI scribe athena marketplace listing
Amwell	3% (HIMSS 2024)	Varies by AI scribe vendor	Enterprise telehealth platform—verify specific AI scribe compatibility before selection. Some vendors have native integration
Teladoc	2% (HIMSS 2024)	Varies by AI scribe vendor	B2B telehealth infrastructure—compatibility varies. Check with AI scribe vendor for Teladoc-specific support
Google Meet	2% (HIMSS 2024)	Browser extension, system audio	Less common in healthcare but growing. Browser extension support typical. HIPAA BAA required from Google

Ensuring Platform Compatibility

Before selecting a telehealth AI scribe, verify these technical requirements with your vendor:

1. Explicit Platform Support: Confirm your specific telehealth platform and version are supported
2. Integration Method: Understand which capture method will be used (system audio, native integration, browser extension)
3. Audio Quality Expected: Ask for typical capture quality metrics (% completeness, latency)
4. Setup Complexity: Determine IT requirements for deployment (client software, browser extensions, permissions)
5. Cross-Platform Consistency: If using multiple telehealth platforms, verify consistent experience across all
6. Mobile Support: Confirm support for iOS/Android if conducting telehealth from mobile devices
7. Fallback Options: Understand what happens if primary integration method fails

---

Benefits for Virtual Care

Provider Benefits: Transforming Telehealth Experience

Patient Benefits: Enhanced Virtual Care Quality

Benefit	Description	Impact Metrics
Undivided Attention	Provider focused entirely on patient, not screen and keyboard	43% improvement in patient-reported provider attentiveness scores (MGMA 2024)
More Natural Communication	Conversation flows naturally without typing interruptions	15% patient satisfaction improvement for AI-scribed telehealth vs. manually documented (KLAS 2024)
Complete Information Capture	Everything discussed is documented accurately—nothing missed while multitasking	23% improvement in documentation completeness—93-97% key element capture with AI vs. 76-82% manual multitasking
Faster After-Visit Summaries	Patient-friendly summaries available immediately after visit	Summaries delivered 2-4 hours faster—within 30 minutes vs. 3-6 hours for manual creation (MGMA 2024)
Improved Follow-Through	AI-extracted action items ensure recommended follow-ups happen	52-67% reduction in missed follow-up appointments/tests (Black Book 2024)—critical safety improvement
Enhanced Trust & Satisfaction	Telehealth experience approaches in-person care quality perception	Patient satisfaction gap between telehealth and in-person narrowed from 18% to 6% with AI scribes (KLAS 2024)

Organizational Benefits: Scaling Virtual Care Profitably

Increased Telehealth Volume Without Proportional Staff Growth:
Organizations using AI scribes for telehealth can increase virtual visit volume 25-40% without adding documentation support staff (MGMA 2024). Traditional telehealth scaling required either hiring remote scribes (costly) or accepting provider documentation burden increase (drives burnout). AI scribes break this constraint—providers handle more visits while documentation burden decreases.

Improved Coding & Revenue Capture:
Complete AI-generated documentation supports appropriate billing complexity. MGMA 2024 analysis shows 5-12% billing optimization with AI scribes through better E/M level support, improved chronic care management documentation, enhanced time-based billing accuracy, and complete documentation of all services provided during telehealth encounters. For ROI analysis, see our AI Medical Scribe ROI Calculator.

Faster Chart Closure & Compliance:
Same-day chart closure rates improve from 78-85% without AI to 94-97% with AI (Black Book 2024). Critical for compliance, billing cycles, and quality metrics. Reduces risk of incomplete charts, supports faster billing cycles, improves quality measure reporting, and enhances patient safety through immediate documentation availability.

Provider Retention & Satisfaction:
Documentation burden is the #2 reason physicians leave telehealth roles (after compensation). AI scribes reduce documentation-related turnover intent by 43% among telehealth providers (AMA 2025 workforce study). Organizations report 68% increase in provider willingness to accept telehealth assignments when AI scribes are available.

Scalable Virtual Care Programs:
Enable organizational strategy to expand virtual care without traditional constraints. Support hybrid workforce models (in-person + remote providers), expand telehealth access to underserved areas, offer extended hours virtual care without documentation bottleneck, and scale specialty telehealth programs cost-effectively.

Telehealth AI Scribe ROI Metrics

ROI Metric	Typical Impact	Source
Documentation Time Reduction	69-81%	MGMA 2024
Additional Daily Visits Possible	2.4 per provider	MGMA 2024 capacity analysis
After-Hours Documentation Reduction	87%	Stanford 2024 telehealth cohort
Same-Day Chart Closure Rate	94-97%	Black Book 2024 (vs. 78-85% manual)
Provider Satisfaction Improvement	32-48%	KLAS 2024 physician surveys
Patient Satisfaction Improvement	15%	KLAS 2024 (telehealth-specific)
Coding Accuracy & Revenue Improvement	5-12%	MGMA 2024 billing analysis
Telehealth Volume Capacity Increase	25-40%	MGMA 2024 (without staff increase)
3-Year ROI for Telehealth-Focused Practices	4,800-6,500%	Black Book 2024
Burnout Score Improvement (6 months)	30%	Stanford 2024 telehealth providers
Provider Turnover Intent Reduction	43%	AMA 2025 workforce study

---

Challenges & Solutions for Telehealth AI Scribes

Common Telehealth-Specific Challenges

Challenge	Root Cause	Solution Approach	Expected Outcome
Audio Quality Variability	Patient poor internet (8-15% of calls), suboptimal microphone, home environment noise	AI deep learning noise filtering trained on 100,000+ hours home audio; patient audio setup guidance	Maintains accuracy within 2-4% of optimal conditions (JAMIA 2024) vs. 12-18% degradation without specialized filtering
Speaker Attribution Errors	Similar voices, limited visual cues, overlapping speech in multi-party calls	Advanced multi-modal diarization: voice biometrics + contextual attribution + role-based prediction	90-95% accuracy for 2-party calls, 85-92% for 3+ parties (JAMIA 2024)
Background Noise Interference	Patient home environment: children, pets, doorbells, TV, sirens, appliances, roommates	Telehealth-specific noise suppression models; patient pre-visit setup instructions	8-15% accuracy improvement vs. generic noise filtering (JAMIA 2024)
Network Connection Dropouts	Internet instability causing brief audio loss—occurs in 12-18% of telehealth calls	Intelligent reconnection handling; gap detection and flagging; audio buffer recovery	96-98% audio recovery for disconnections <10 seconds; clear flagging of longer gaps for physician review
Multiple Participant Complexity	Family members, caregivers joining call—23% of telehealth encounters have 3+ participants	Multi-speaker diarization up to 5-6 participants; optional speaker identification at call start	85-92% attribution accuracy for 3-4 participants; 78-85% for 5-6 participants (JAMIA 2024)
Phone-Only Visit Lower Quality	Audio-only calls (8-12% of telehealth) have lower bandwidth, compression artifacts, no video context	Phone-optimized acoustic models; aggressive noise filtering; enhanced context inference	Accuracy 3-7% lower than video calls but still achieves 89-94% clinical accuracy (JAMIA 2024)
Platform Compatibility Issues	Practices use 2-3 different telehealth platforms (HIMSS 2024); platform updates break integrations	Universal system audio capture as fallback; proactive platform update monitoring; multi-platform support	98-99% uptime across platform updates; consistent experience across Zoom, Teams, Doxy.me, others

---

Best Practices for Telehealth AI Scribes

Before the Visit: Setup & Preparation

During the Visit: Speaking Techniques for Telehealth

Telehealth AI scribes work best when physicians follow these evidence-based speaking techniques from JAMIA 2024 telehealth study:

Best Practice	Why It Helps	Impact / Example
Speak naturally and conversationally	AI trained on natural dialogue, not dictation-style. Conversational speech is what system expects	Natural: “Tell me about your chest pain.” Dictation style not needed: “HPI: Chest pain. Duration: Three days.”
Verbalize visual observations	AI cannot see video feed—must verbalize what you observe to capture exam findings	“I can see the rash on your arm appears improved since last week—the redness has faded significantly.”
Summarize key points explicitly	Helps AI identify most important clinical information to emphasize in documentation	“So to summarize, you’re having worsening shortness of breath with exertion, and we need to adjust your heart failure medications.”
State diagnoses and assessments clearly	Explicit diagnostic statements ensure AI correctly captures assessment section	“Based on your symptoms and exam today, I believe you have acute bronchitis, not pneumonia, and we don’t need antibiotics yet.”
Verbalize prescriptions and dosing	Ensures accurate medication documentation with proper dosing instructions	“I’m prescribing azithromycin 250 milligrams—you’ll take 2 tablets today, then 1 tablet daily for the next 4 days.”
Articulate the care plan	Clear plan discussion ensures complete documentation of follow-up and patient instructions	“Here’s our plan: finish the antibiotics, increase fluids, follow up with me in 2 weeks or sooner if symptoms worsen.”
Pause briefly between major topics	Helps AI segment conversation into HPI, ROS, Exam, Assessment, Plan sections	1-2 second pause when transitioning: “Now let’s move on to the physical examination…” [pause]
Confirm patient understanding	Documents shared decision-making and patient education—improves compliance	“Do you have any questions about this plan?” “Can you tell me back what you’ll do when you get home?”

After the Visit: Review & Sign Workflow

Optimal Review Process (MGMA 2024 best practices):

1. Review promptly while fresh: Complete review within 5-10 minutes of visit conclusion while conversation is still in recent memory—reduces review time 20-30% vs. reviewing hours later
2. Use targeted scanning approach: Focus on high-risk elements requiring verification: medications (names, doses, frequencies), diagnoses and assessment statements, action items and follow-up plans, patient instructions and education, numbers (vitals, lab values, dosages). Scan rest of note for obvious errors
3. Make targeted edits, not wholesale rewrites: Correct specific errors rather than deleting entire sections—helps AI learn from your corrections for future improvement
4. Sign and close same session: Complete sign-off before starting next patient—94-97% same-day closure achievable vs. 78-85% if deferred (Black Book 2024)
5. Provide vendor feedback on systematic errors: If AI consistently misrecognizes specific terms or makes pattern errors, report to vendor for model improvement—benefits all users

Patient Communication: Introducing AI Scribes

---

Security & Compliance for Telehealth AI Scribes

HIPAA Compliance Requirements

Telehealth AI scribes must meet comprehensive HIPAA compliance standards for protected health information:

Requirement	Implementation for Telehealth AI Scribes	Verification Steps
Business Associate Agreement (BAA)	Required legal contract between covered entity (your practice) and AI scribe vendor establishing HIPAA obligations	Request and review BAA before implementation; verify it covers telehealth use case specifically; have legal counsel review
Encryption in Transit	TLS 1.2+ encryption for all audio transmission from your device to AI scribe servers during telehealth calls	Confirm vendor uses TLS 1.2 or 1.3; verify no audio transmitted in plain text; review security documentation
Encryption at Rest	AES-256 encryption for stored audio recordings, transcripts, and generated clinical notes	Verify encryption standard (AES-256 minimum); confirm key management practices; review data storage policies
Access Controls	Role-based access control (RBAC) ensuring only authorized users access PHI; multi-factor authentication required	Test access controls; verify MFA implementation; review user permission structure; confirm least privilege principle
Audit Trails	Complete logging of all access to PHI—who accessed what data when; immutable audit logs retained minimum 6 years	Request audit log samples; verify completeness; confirm retention period; test audit trail immutability
Data Retention Policies	Clear policies for how long audio/transcripts stored; compliant data deletion procedures; support for patient data deletion requests	Review data retention policy; understand deletion procedures; test patient data deletion workflow if applicable
Breach Notification	Vendor commits to notify you within 24-48 hours of any suspected PHI breach; documented breach response plan	Review breach notification terms in BAA; understand notification timeline; verify vendor breach response procedures

Patient Consent for Telehealth AI Scribes

Best practices for obtaining and documenting patient consent for AI-scribed telehealth visits:

Verbal Consent Approach (Recommended):
Obtain consent verbally at the start of each telehealth visit using scripted introduction (see Best Practices section above). Benefits: patient hears explanation in physician’s voice, allows questions/concerns in real-time, documented within AI-generated note itself, easily implemented without process changes. KLAS 2024 shows 94-97% patient acceptance with this approach.

Written Consent Approach:
Include AI scribe disclosure in telehealth consent forms patients sign before visit. Benefits: one-time consent covers all telehealth visits, meets documentation requirements comprehensively, less repetition visit-to-visit. Drawbacks: patients may not carefully read forms, requires process changes, harder to answer patient questions about AI scribing.

Hybrid Approach (Best Practice):
Written consent in telehealth intake forms plus brief verbal confirmation at first AI-scribed visit. Provides comprehensive documentation while maintaining patient communication.

Essential Elements of Consent:

• Clear statement that AI technology records and documents the visit
• Explanation of purpose (physician attention, accurate documentation)
• Security and privacy assurances (HIPAA compliance, limited use for medical record)
• Easy opt-out option (patient can decline without penalty)
• Documentation of consent in medical record

State-Specific Recording Consent Laws

---

Specialty Use Cases for Telehealth AI Scribes

Primary Care Telehealth

Primary care practices see the highest telehealth adoption and derive substantial benefit from AI scribes. MGMA 2024 analysis of 15,000+ primary care telehealth encounters shows:

Ideal Visit Types:

• Acute illness consultations (cold, flu, sinus infection, UTI, pink eye)—84% of primary care telehealth volume
• Chronic disease follow-ups (diabetes, hypertension, asthma)—maintain care continuity between in-person visits
• Medication management and refill visits
• Lab/test result reviews and care plan adjustments
• Preventive care discussions and health maintenance
• Behavioral health screening and brief counseling

AI Scribe Performance in Primary Care Telehealth:
Leading AI scribes achieve 96-99% accuracy for primary care telehealth encounters (KLAS 2024), higher than many specialties due to common terminology and well-established conversation patterns. Time savings of 72-84% vs. manual documentation (MGMA 2024). For comprehensive primary care AI scribe guidance, see our AI Medical Scribe for Primary Care guide.

Behavioral Health Telehealth

Mental health and substance use disorder treatment via telehealth has grown 347% since 2020 (HIMSS 2024). AI scribes are particularly valuable for behavioral health for several reasons:

Unique Behavioral Health Benefits:

• Therapy sessions fully captured: Complete conversation documentation without therapist note-taking distraction—enables full presence and therapeutic relationship
• Detailed mental status examination: AI accurately documents mental status findings, affect, thought content when verbalized by clinician
• Progress tracking over time: Consistent documentation enables longitudinal symptom tracking across therapy sessions
• Privacy preference: Many patients more comfortable with AI documentation than human scribes for sensitive mental health content—87% patient preference in KLAS 2024 study
• Risk assessment documentation: Critical safety documentation of suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, safety plans captured completely

Behavioral Health-Specific Considerations:
AI scribes for behavioral health must filter therapeutic dialogue appropriately, distinguish clinician observations from patient statements, capture risk assessments and safety planning comprehensively, and document both content and process of therapy sessions. Leading systems achieve 94-97% accuracy for behavioral health telehealth (KLAS 2024).

Specialty Telehealth Applications

Specialty	Common Telehealth Use Cases	AI Scribe Benefits & Accuracy
Dermatology	Skin condition evaluation via high-resolution photos and video examination; acne, rash, lesion assessment; mole checks	Captures detailed lesion descriptions when physician verbalizes observations. 93-97% accuracy (KLAS 2024). Must verbalize visual findings: “I see a 5mm brown macule on the left cheek with irregular borders.”
Endocrinology	Diabetes management and medication adjustments; thyroid disease follow-up; reviewing home glucose logs; insulin titration	Excellent for complex medication discussions—accurately captures insulin dose changes, metformin titration, thyroid medication adjustments. 95-98% accuracy (KLAS 2024) for endocrine telehealth.
Neurology	Headache and migraine follow-ups; seizure management; MS symptom monitoring; Parkinson’s medication adjustments	Captures symptom patterns, triggers, temporal relationships well. 92-96% accuracy (KLAS 2024). Benefits from physician verbalizing neurological exam observations via video.
Cardiology	Post-procedure follow-ups; heart failure symptom monitoring and diuretic adjustment; medication management for AFib, HTN	Strong for symptom review and med management. 94-97% accuracy (Black Book 2024). Ensure verbalization of vital signs reviewed (BP, HR, weight changes).
Rheumatology	Chronic arthritis management; DMARD monitoring; inflammatory bowel disease follow-ups; joint pain assessment	Tracks joint symptoms, functional status, medication side effects over time. 93-96% accuracy (KLAS 2024). Document visual joint assessment when patient shows affected areas on video.
Pulmonology	COPD/asthma management; sleep apnea follow-up; chronic cough evaluation; review of home spirometry	Captures respiratory symptom detail, inhaler technique discussion, peak flow data review. 94-97% accuracy (Black Book 2024).
Infectious Disease	COVID-19 monitoring and management; HIV care continuity; antibiotic management for complex infections; travel medicine consultations	Excellent for symptom monitoring and medication counseling. 95-98% accuracy. Pandemic accelerated telehealth ID adoption—AI scribes enable scalability.

For detailed specialty-specific AI scribe guidance across 20+ specialties, see our comprehensive AI Medical Scribe for Specialists guide.

---

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the AI scribe work with my telehealth platform?

Most leading AI scribes support major telehealth platforms including Zoom for Healthcare (38% market share), Microsoft Teams (24%), and Doxy.me (18%), according to HIMSS 2024 data. Integration methods vary by vendor and platform—some use native platform APIs (98-99% audio capture quality), others use system-level audio capture (96-99% quality) that works with any platform, and browser extensions (95-98% quality) for browser-based telehealth. Before selecting an AI scribe, verify explicit support for your specific telehealth platform and version, understand the integration method that will be used (native, system audio, browser extension), review expected audio capture quality metrics, confirm setup requirements and complexity, and test with your actual telehealth setup during evaluation. For multi-platform practices (92% use 2-3 platforms per HIMSS 2024), prioritize vendors with broad platform support to ensure consistent experience.

How does the AI know who is speaking during a video call?

Telehealth AI scribes use advanced speaker diarization technology combining multiple techniques to distinguish speakers. Voice biometric analysis examines fundamental frequency (pitch), formant patterns, speaking rate, prosody, and voice quality to create unique speaker profiles, achieving 92-96% accuracy for two speakers (JAMIA 2024). Some platforms like Zoom and Teams provide separate stereo audio channels for each participant, enabling 98-99% attribution accuracy when available. Contextual attribution uses medical knowledge to logically assign statements—questions about symptoms typically physician, symptom descriptions typically patient, improving accuracy 5-8% beyond voice analysis alone. Role-based prediction applies machine learning models trained on 100,000+ physician-patient conversations to recognize conversational patterns—physicians tend to ask more questions and use medical terminology, patients describe experiences and ask about side effects. For standard 2-3 party calls (physician-patient or physician-patient-family), leading systems achieve 90-95% speaker attribution accuracy (JAMIA 2024). Accuracy decreases to 85-92% for calls with 4+ participants or phone-only audio without video context. Some systems allow brief speaker identification at call start (each person says name) for optimal multi-party accuracy.

What if the patient has poor audio quality or internet connection?

Modern telehealth AI scribes are specifically engineered to handle variable audio quality common in home environments. Deep learning noise suppression models trained on 100,000+ hours of home environment audio filter background sounds (children, pets, TV, doorbells, appliances) while preserving speech, achieving 8-15% accuracy improvement versus generic noise filtering (JAMIA 2024). Adaptive bitrate processing automatically adjusts to detected audio quality, applying more aggressive filtering when signal-to-noise ratio drops and switching to more robust transcription models for degraded audio. Packet loss concealment algorithms predict missing audio samples when internet drops packets (occurs in 8-15% of telehealth calls), reducing transcription errors from 12-18% to 3-6% during packet loss events. For brief connection drops (occur in 12-18% of calls), intelligent reconnection handling detects gaps, flags them for physician review, and seamlessly resumes capture when reconnected—leading systems achieve 96-98% audio recovery for disconnections under 10 seconds. However, severely degraded audio (persistent >60% packet loss, background noise >60 dB above speech) may reduce accuracy below acceptable thresholds—systems flag low-confidence transcriptions for physician attention. Pre-visit patient audio setup guidance (quiet space, WiFi over cellular, headphones when possible) improves audio quality 15-25% and is recommended best practice.

Do patients need to consent to AI scribing during telehealth visits?

Yes, patient consent is legally required and represents best practice for ethical telehealth documentation. Consent requirements vary significantly by state—11 states including California, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts require two-party consent where all parties must explicitly agree to recording, while the majority of states require only one-party consent meaning only one party (the physician) needs to know about recording. Critical complication for telehealth: when physician and patient are in different states, you must comply with the stricter state’s law—if physician is in Texas (one-party state) but patient is in California (two-party state), California’s two-party consent applies and patient must explicitly consent. Best practice recommended by KLAS 2024 patient communication study: obtain verbal consent at start of each telehealth visit using brief scripted introduction (20-30 seconds) that includes transparency (clearly state AI is being used), benefit framing (emphasize patient receives physician full attention), security assurance (mention HIPAA compliance and limited use for medical record), explicit consent request (ask permission, offer opt-out), and documentation (consent captured in AI-generated note). This approach achieves 94-97% patient acceptance rates. Alternative approaches include written consent in telehealth intake forms (one-time consent covering all visits) or hybrid approach combining written consent with verbal confirmation at first AI-scribed visit. Regardless of method, essential elements must include clear statement AI records visit, explanation of purpose, security/privacy assurances, easy opt-out option, and consent documentation in medical record. Consult legal counsel for specific requirements in states where you provide telehealth services.

Can AI scribes handle phone-only telehealth visits?

Yes, most AI scribes can document audio-only visits, though with slightly reduced accuracy compared to video calls. Phone-only visits represent 8-12% of telehealth encounters (HIMSS 2024) and present unique challenges: lower audio bandwidth (typically 8-32 kbps vs. 32-48+ kbps for video calls), codec compression artifacts from cellular networks, absence of video context for visual cues, often poorer microphone quality (phone handset vs. computer microphone). Advanced AI scribes deploy phone-optimized acoustic models specifically trained on telephone audio characteristics, aggressive noise filtering to handle cellular network artifacts and background noise, enhanced context inference to compensate for missing visual information, and specialized speaker diarization tuned for phone call audio patterns. Result: phone-only visit accuracy is typically 3-7% lower than video calls but still achieves clinically acceptable 89-94% accuracy for most encounters (JAMIA 2024). Black Book 2024 telehealth study shows phone-only documentation time savings of 62-75% versus manual (compared to 69-81% for video visits)—still substantial efficiency gain despite slightly lower accuracy. Best practice for phone-only visits: physician verbalizes observations more explicitly since no visual channel exists, patients describe symptoms with more detail to compensate for no video examination, and providers conduct slightly longer review of AI-generated notes (2-4 minutes vs. 1-3 minutes for video) to catch any audio quality-related errors.

How fast is the note available after a telehealth visit ends?

Leading telehealth AI scribes generate structured clinical notes within 1-3 minutes after visit conclusion, according to MGMA 2024 performance benchmarking across 15 major vendors. This rapid turnaround is critical for back-to-back telehealth scheduling where visits may be separated by only 2-3 minutes. Processing pipeline stages execute in parallel: real-time transcription occurs during the call with progressive transcription tracking speaker utterances as they happen, clinical NLP and entity extraction begins processing early segments while call continues, contextual understanding and clinical reasoning operate on near-complete transcript during final minutes of call, and structured note generation and formatting execute in final 60-120 seconds after call ends. Some advanced systems provide live transcription visible during the call on a second screen or overlay, enabling physicians to monitor capture quality in real-time and reference previous statements. Draft note typically appears in AI scribe interface within 60-90 seconds after call ends for simple encounters, 90-180 seconds for complex multi-problem visits. EHR delivery adds 15-45 seconds depending on integration method—direct API integration is fastest, copy-paste workflows add manual time. Result: physicians can review and sign notes within 2-4 minutes of visit conclusion, enabling same-day chart closure rates of 94-97% (Black Book 2024) versus 78-85% for manually documented telehealth. Fast processing particularly benefits high-volume telehealth providers conducting 15-25+ virtual visits daily, where even 5-minute note delays would create significant documentation backlog.

What happens if the internet connection drops during a telehealth visit?

Brief internet connection drops are common in telehealth—occurring in 12-18% of calls according to JAMIA 2024 network quality analysis—and leading AI scribes handle them gracefully. Intelligent reconnection handling uses several mechanisms: connection monitoring continuously tracks audio stream health, detecting degradation or loss within 2-3 seconds; audio buffering maintains local audio buffer capturing 5-10 seconds of conversation even during brief network interruptions; gap detection precisely identifies where audio loss occurred, flagging the time window and duration for physician review; automatic resume seamlessly continues capture when connection restored, synchronizing with telehealth platform reconnection; and quality assessment analyzes audio before and after dropout to assess information loss and confidence. Performance metrics from Black Book 2024 testing: for connection drops under 10 seconds (87% of dropouts), leading systems achieve 96-98% audio recovery—minimal impact on note quality; for drops 10-30 seconds (9% of dropouts), systems recover 78-88% of content with clear gap flagging; for extended outages over 30 seconds (4% of dropouts), substantial gaps occur and systems prominently flag incomplete documentation requiring physician attention and potential manual entry of missing information. Best practices when dropout occurs: AI scribe highlights affected sections in generated note, physician reviews flagged areas carefully during note review, physician adds any critical missing information from memory, and follow-up call may be warranted for critical missing discussions. Most practices find brief dropouts have minimal impact on documentation quality given high recovery rates, while extended outages are rare enough (4% of calls) to not significantly impact overall efficiency gains.

Can AI scribes handle multi-party calls with interpreters or family members?

Yes, advanced AI scribes can document multi-party telehealth calls, though accuracy decreases modestly as participant count increases. Multi-party scenarios common in telehealth include patient plus family member or caregiver (23% of encounters), patient plus professional medical interpreter (8-12% of encounters in diverse populations), multiple providers consulting simultaneously (5-8% of encounters), and patient plus support person plus interpreter (2-4% of encounters). Speaker diarization performance for multi-party calls according to JAMIA 2024 analysis: 2 participants (physician + patient) achieves 90-95% attribution accuracy baseline; 3 participants (physician + patient + family member or interpreter) drops to 85-92% accuracy; 4 participants decreases to 82-88% accuracy; 5-6 participants further decreases to 78-85% accuracy. Technical approach for multi-party calls: enhanced voice biometric models distinguish 4-6+ unique voice profiles, role-based attribution uses conversational patterns to infer roles (who asks questions suggests provider, who translates suggests interpreter), contextual understanding of three-way interpreted conversations (physician question → interpreter translates → patient answers → interpreter translates back), and optional speaker identification at call start where each participant briefly states name dramatically improves accuracy (adds 4-7 percentage points). Special considerations for interpreted calls: AI must distinguish physician, patient, and interpreter speech; accurately capture both original language discussion and English translation; and handle temporal lag as interpreter translates (overlapping speech challenge). Leading systems achieve 82-88% accuracy for interpreted 3-party calls (Black Book 2024), sufficient for clinical utility but requiring more careful physician review. Some vendors offer specialty interpreter call modes optimized for this workflow. For family member calls, attribution is less critical—what matters is complete capture of discussion regardless of whether specific statements attributed to patient vs. family member.

How do telehealth AI scribes compare to in-person AI scribes?

Telehealth and in-person AI scribes share core technology (speech recognition, clinical NLP, note generation) but telehealth versions include specialized capabilities for virtual care challenges. Accuracy comparison from KLAS 2024 cross-platform study: in-person AI scribes achieve 95-99% clinical accuracy in controlled office environments with professional microphones, minimal background noise, and close physician-patient proximity; telehealth AI scribes achieve 94-98% clinical accuracy despite variable home audio quality, internet compression, and limited visual context—only 1-2 percentage point difference, remarkably similar given telehealth audio challenges. Key differences in telehealth AI scribe design: multi-platform audio capture (must work with Zoom, Teams, Doxy.me vs. single office environment), network quality optimization (packet loss handling, jitter buffers, connection drop recovery vs. reliable wired connections), home environment noise filtering (children, pets, TV vs. clinical office sounds), compressed audio processing (32-48 kbps telehealth audio vs. uncompressed office audio), and speaker diarization complexity (limited visual cues via video vs. in-person nonverbal information). Workflow comparison shows telehealth AI scribes enable faster note availability (1-3 minutes due to necessity for back-to-back scheduling) versus in-person systems (sometimes 3-5 minutes acceptable given visit transition time). Patient acceptance similar: 94-97% for both telehealth and in-person (KLAS 2024). Bottom line: telehealth AI scribes deliver nearly equivalent accuracy and efficiency to in-person systems despite more challenging technical environment—testament to sophisticated engineering specifically optimized for virtual care. Providers should not compromise on AI scribe quality when conducting telehealth; expect similar performance to in-person documentation assistance.

---

---

References: KLAS Research 2024 AI Scribe Performance Report | MGMA 2024 Telehealth Documentation Study | JAMIA 2024 Telehealth AI Analysis | Black Book 2024 AI Scribe Market Survey | HIMSS 2024 Telehealth Analytics | Stanford Medicine 2024 Physician Burnout Research | AMA 2025 Physician Workforce Study | American Telemedicine Association Best Practices | Healthcare provider workflow studies | Vendor technical documentation and case studies

Disclaimer: Platform compatibility, feature availability, and performance metrics vary by AI scribe vendor and implementation. Statistics and benchmarks represent industry averages from published research; individual results may differ. Accuracy rates depend on audio quality, network conditions, specialty, and use case. Recording consent laws vary significantly by state and international jurisdiction—consult legal counsel for requirements in your specific location. HIPAA compliance requirements apply to all telehealth AI scribe implementations—verify vendor compliance before deployment. This information represents general capabilities and best practices for telehealth AI scribes as of November 2025.

Last Updated: November 2025 | This article is regularly updated to reflect current telehealth AI scribe technology, research findings, and best practices.